Conspiraloon Alliance Logo of the Month

Is it a cult? Is it a church? Is it a U.F.O. (Unidentified Faith Organisation)?

Can you guess what it is yet?

Say what you like about the Cult of Scientology, but don't ever suggest that their logo is comprised of two pyramids interlocked by a serpent.

Get a load of this fucking cunt

Counterfactual fiction is a popular genre where turning points in history are reconsidered with a different outcome than the one we accept as reality.
Usually they involve Hitler winning the WW2 and we find ourselves in a world where nazi sympathisers such as IBM, Coca Cola, the Thyssen-Bornemisza and Bush families actually profit from the war! Henceforth this is now officially old hat.
We have entered the age of counterfactual reality.....

Meet the Family

POW-EL AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA POE-EL

The Powell family have been assigned the franchise of political handlers by our overlords. Between them, they have diligently tended the dismantling of representative government we have enjoyed over the last 30 years. Curiously the two wings of this management team pronounce their surnames differently; brother Charles takes the aristocratic styling of 'POE-EL' while Jonathan favours Enoch's earthy, demotic 'POW-EL', as befits one who leans to the left. Maybe they do it lest the 'general public' realise they came from the same clutch of reptile eggs.

Accept their alien gift to our planet

This talented family have today gifted us with an entirely new subgenre in POW-EL's extraordinary piece in the Observer:

Why the West should kill other people

which takes the final step into counterfactual-reality.
POW - EL's article, like the man himself, is obviously from another planet...I am content to let his words speak for themselves:

We now know Saddam didn't have them. But to suggest it was all a conspiracy between Tony Blair and George W Bush to pretend he did is nonsense.

So suggesting it was all a matter of Alastair Campbell cobbling together a dossier to pretend there were weapons of mass destruction is nonsense

We should have been clear we were removing Saddam because he was a ruthless dictator suppressing his people. But the lawyers said there was no legal basis for proceeding on these grounds, and so we were not able to make this case as wholeheartedly as I would have liked.

When you remove a brutal dictator who has annihilated all opposition for 30 years, it is inevitable you will face a period of anarchy when he is gone. All the basics of an ordinary society and law and order are not there.

And most of all it means trying to ensure that the US does not revert to isolationism. If it withdraws into itself as it did after Vietnam and Somalia, I fear it will face another 9/11 and all the rest of us will suffer.

Once the Sunnis have come to terms with sharing power with the Shia, our task will be done. It is only when there is a political settlement that we will be able to leave.

In Iran, I am not in favour of a military option because I don't think it is practical.

The threat we face is from those that advocate isolationism, protectionism and nativism - and it is striking how the debate on immigration has taken off in Europe and in the US.

The enemy are the people who want to divide us into groups, to turn people against one another and take society backwards.

There you have it, brothers and sisters, NWO thinking in its orginal nut shell:

We'll attack anyone we want, whenever we can get away with it, and if it goes hard on the liberated, well that's foreigners for you.

If you can find a word of truth in the whole piece, you're a better man than I.

Alien Hunter

The Alliance laboratories recently detected a spike in the full spectrum weirdness continuum. This has proved to be a very reliable guide to alien activity in human form. The alien in question lurks under the name of Philip Atkinson. Reaching for Ockham's Hammer to crack open this nut, we must ask ourselves, can this be a human?

The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead.

President Bush can fail in his duty to himself, his country, and his God, by becoming “ex-president” Bush or he can become “President-for-Life” Bush: the conqueror of Iraq, who brings sense to the Congress and sanity to the Supreme Court.

For the Romans the use of genocide was not evil but essential for securing and protecting their property and lives, and therefore a good act.

This attack was a Barbarian Raid signalling the start of hostilities that will only cease when the citizens of Western Civilization have all been killed or enslaved.

If President Bush copied Julius Caesar by ordering his army to empty Iraq of Arabs and repopulate the country with Americans, he would achieve immediate results: popularity with his military; enrichment of America by converting an Arabian Iraq into an American Iraq (therefore turning it from a liability to an asset); and boost American prestiege while terrifying American enemies.

He could then follow Caesar's example and use his newfound popularity with the military to wield military power to become the first permanent president of America, and end the civil chaos caused by the continually squabbling Congress and the out-of-control Supreme Court.

In this war Nuclear weapons compel an unwelcome choice upon the citizens of Western Civilization: genocide or suicide.

For example, following the threat by Iran (who is now (circa 2006) building nuclear weapons) to "wipe Israel off the map", should the Israelis wait and see if their cities disappear in a flash, or should they make the Iranian cities disappear first?

Now this may very well be alright in this creature's home dimension, but do we really want it here?