Following the videos, that were both chilling and shocking, shown on colour television last night, conspiranoid frequent flyers are advised to watch out for:
- Airplanes with windows made of 12mm safety glass rather than the normal triple pane construction
- Airplanes with bits of plastic leaning against the walls purely to fly about in an alarming fashion
- Fellow passengers with prosthetic robot arms
And before flying, make sure no one in your community has conducted around 30 test explosions in a flat near you.. A quick call to your local nick should clear this up, as they routinely film these things.
We do not wish to alarm our community as:
- A transatlantic liner such as the 747 can retain cabin pressure with up to five windows missing, (even non standard ones we presume), apart from in films.
- Airplane toilets do not have windows, to prevent nosy seagulls watching you have a dump, wank or 'filling in' your application to the 'mile high' club.
- These loose lying panels have never been observed-YET!!
- Home made robot prosthetics are very hard to fabricate in a surveilled flat, even harder than explosives. They are also trickier than the compact, but deadly, victorinix picknicker to get through airport scanners. Especially when attached to brown skinned cartoon joke-hadis.
- Terror Tech Tip: It is advisable to construct the robot arms in situ, from a set of components disguised as innocuous everyday objects, like Scaramanga's infamous 'Golden Gun'. We suggest a telescopic tree lopper, central heating motor and a car battery. The hydraulics can be rigged together using garden hose filled with TANG! (diluted 10 parts to one)!
Notes:
The device, made from an Oasis soft drink bottle, had to be put together with a remote controlled arm at a government laboratory because the mixture was so volatile, a jury heard.
Keith Ritchie, a senior case office at the Forensic Explosives Laboratory said: “If the mixture reacted unexpectedly with the detonator inside it would result in the death of anybody nearby.”
But judge Mr Justice Calvert-Smith questioned the relevance of viewing the hypothetical tests.
"We have to deal with fact," he told the court. "This is a conspiracy rather than actually causing an explosion or murder."
The judge said the jury's concern was whether such an explosion would have endangered an aircraft and killed anybody.