Showing posts with label murderer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label murderer. Show all posts

Friday, 6 February 2009

Nuts Can Be Harmful

Example given: a limp salad of mixed platitudes, sprinkled with croutons of pseudo-erudtion, smothered in a greasy, tasteless dressing; one part self aggrandisement to five parts self pity.
The mind behind the words may deny analysis, but the words reveal all.
Our Middle East envoy,finance flunkey and worthless panderer to power speaks:

It is an honour to be here. A particular honour to be with you Mr. President. The world participated in the celebration of your election. Now the hard work begins. And now, also we should be as steadfast for you in the hard work as in the celebration. You don’t need cheerleaders but partners; not spectators but supporters. The truest friends are those still around when the going is toughest. We offer you our friendship today. We will work with you to make your Presidency one that shapes our destiny to the credit of America and of the world. Mr President, we salute you and wish you well.

After 10 years as British Prime Minister, I decided to choose something easy. I became involved in the Middle East Peace Process.

There are many frustrations – that is evident. There is also one blessing. I spend much of my time in the Holy Land and in the Holy City. The other evening I climbed to the top of Notre Dame in Jerusalem. You look left and see the Garden of Gethsemane. You look right and see where the Last Supper was held. Straight ahead lies Golgotha. In the distance is where King David was crowned and still further where Abraham was laid to rest. And of course in the centre of Jerusalem is the Al Aqsa Mosque, where according to the Qur’an, the Prophet was transported to commune with the prophets of the past.

Rich in conflict, it is also sublime in history. The other month in Jericho, I visited the Mount of Temptation. I think they bring all the political leaders there. My guide – a Palestinian – was bemoaning the travails of his nation. Suddenly he stopped, looked heaven wards and said “Moses, Jesus, Mohammed: why did they all have to come here?”

It is a good place to reflect on religion: a source of so much inspiration; an excuse for so much evil.

Today, religion is under attack from without and from within. From within, it is corroded by extremists who use their faith as a means of excluding the other. I am what I am in opposition to you. If you do not believe as I believe, you are a lesser human being.

From without, religious faith is assailed by an increasingly aggressive secularism, which derides faith as contrary to reason and defines faith by conflict. Thus do the extreme believers and the aggressive non-believers come together in unholy alliance.

And yet, faith will not be so easily cast. For billions of people, faith motivates, galvanises, compels and inspires, not to exclude but to embrace; not to provoke conflict but to try to do good. This is faith in action. You can see it in countless local communities where those from churches, mosques, synagogues and temples, tend the sick, care for the afflicted, work long hours in bad conditions to bring hope to the despairing and salvation to the lost. You can see it in the arousing of the world’s conscience to the plight of Africa.

There are a million good deeds done every day by people of faith. These are those for whom, in the parable of the sower, the seed fell on good soil and yielded sixty or a hundredfold.

What inspires such people?

Ritual or doctrine or the finer points of theology? No.

I remember my first spiritual awakening. I was ten years old. That day my father – at the young age of 40 – had suffered a serious stroke. His life hung in the balance. My mother, to keep some sense of normality in the crisis, sent me to school. My teacher knelt and prayed with me. Now my father was a militant atheist. Before we prayed, I thought I should confess this. “I’m afraid my father doesn’t believe in God”. I said. “That doesn’t matter” my teacher replied “God believes in him. He loves him without demanding or needing love in return.”

That is what inspires: the unconditional nature of God’s love. A promise perpetually kept. A covenant never broken.

And in surrendering to God, we become instruments of that love.

Rabbi Hillel was once challenged by a pagan, who said: if you can recite the whole of the Torah standing on one leg, I will convert to being a Jew. Rabbi Hillel stood on one leg and said “That which is hateful to you, do it not unto your neighbour. That is the Torah. Everything else is commentary. Go and study it.”

As the Qur’an states: “if anyone saves a person it will be as if he has saved the whole of humanity”.

Faith is not discovered in acting according to ritual but acting according to God’s will and God’s will is love.

We might also talk of the Hindu “Living beyond the reach of I and mine” or the words of the Buddha “after practising enlightenment you must go back to practise compassion” or the Sikh scripture: “God’s bounties are common to all. It is we who have created divisions.”

Each faith has its beliefs. Each is different. Yet at a certain point each is in communion with the other.

Examine the impact of globalisation. Forget for a moment its rights and wrongs. Just look at its effects. Its characteristic is that it pushes the world together. It is not only an economic force. The consequence is social, even cultural.

The global community – “it takes a village” as someone once coined it – is upon us. Into it steps religious faith. If faith becomes the property of extremists, it will originate discord. But if, by contrast, different faiths can reach out to and have knowledge of one another, then instead of being reactionary, religious faith can be a force for progress.

The Foundation which bears my name and which I began less than a year ago is dedicated to achieving understanding, action and reconciliation between the different faiths for the common good. It is not about the faith that looks inward; but the faith that resolutely turns us towards each other.

Bringing the faith communities together fulfils an objective important to all of us, believers and non-believers.

But as someone of faith, this is not enough. I believe restoring religious faith to its rightful place, as the guide to our world and its future, is itself of the essence. The 21st Century will be poorer in spirit, meaner in ambition, less disciplined in conscience, if it is not under the guardianship of faith in God.

I do not mean by this to blur the correct distinction between the realms of religious and political authority. In Britain we are especially mindful of this. I recall giving an address to the country at a time of crisis. I wanted to end my words with “God bless the British people”. This caused complete consternation. Emergency meetings were convened. The system was aghast. Finally, as I sat trying to defend my words, a senior civil servant said, with utter distain: “Really, Prime Minister, this is not America you know.”

Neither do I decry the work of humanists, who give gladly of themselves for others and who can often shame the avowedly religious. Those who do God’s work are God’s people.

I only say that there are limits to humanism and beyond those limits God and only God can work. The phrase “fear of God” conjures up the vengeful God of parts of the Old Testament. But “fear of God” means really obedience to God; humility before God; acceptance through God that there is something bigger, better and more important than you. It is that humbling of man’s vanity, that stirring of conscience through God’s prompting, that recognition of our limitations, that faith alone can bestow.

We can perform acts of mercy, but only God can lend them dignity. We can forgive, but only God forgives completely in the full knowledge of our sin.

And only through God comes grace; and it is God’s grace that is unique.

John Newton, who had been that most obnoxious of things, a slave-trader, wrote the hymn “Amazing Grace”.

“Twas Grace that taught my heart to fear. And Grace, my fears relieved.”

It is through faith, by the Grace of God, that we have the courage to live as we should and die as we must.

When I was Prime Minister I had cause often to reflect on leadership. Courage in leadership is not simply about having the nerve to take difficult decisions or even in doing the right thing since oftentimes God alone knows what the right thing is.

It is to be in our natural state – which is one of nagging doubt, imperfect knowledge, and uncertain prediction – and to be prepared nonetheless to put on the mantle of responsibility and to stand up in full view of the world, to step out when others step back, to assume the loneliness of the final decision-maker, not sure of success but unsure of it.

And it is in that “not knowing” that the courage lies.

And when in that state, our courage fails, our faith can support it, lift it up, keep it from stumbling.

As you begin your leadership of this great country, Mr President, you are fortunate, as is your nation, that you have already shown in your life, courage in abundance. But should it ever be tested, I hope your faith can sustain you. And your family. The public eye is not always the most congenial.

I was reminded of this, as I waited in London in the snow to fly to America and made the mistake of reading a British newspaper. It was the very conservative Daily Telegraph. A few days ago I gave an interview in which I remarked how much cleverer my wife was than me. The Telegraph has a famous letters page. In it was a letter from a correspondent that read something like: “Dear Sir, with reference to your headline ‘Blair admits wife more intelligent than him’, I fail to see why this is news. Most of us have known this for a long time.” As a PS perhaps: “the bar, however, has not been set high”.

I finish where I began: in the Holy Land, at Mount Nebo in Jordan, where Moses gazed on the Promised Land. There is a chapel there, built by pilgrims in the 4th Century. The sermon was preached by an American, who spent his life as an airline pilot and then, after his wife’s death, took holy orders. His words are the words of a Christian but they speak to all those of faith, who want God’s grace to guide their life.

He said this:

“While here on earth, we need to make a vital decision ... whether to be mere spectators, or movers and shakers for the Kingdom of God... whether to stay among the curious, or take up a cross. And this means: no standing on the sidelines ... We’re either in the game or we’re not. I sometimes ask myself the question: If I were to die today, what would my life have stood for... The answer can’t be an impulsive one, and we all need to count the cost before we give an answer. Because to be able to say yes to one thing, means to say no to many others. But we must also remember, that the greatest danger is not impulsiveness, but inaction.”

It is fitting at this extraordinary moment in your country’s history that we hear that call to action; and we pray that in acting we do God’s work and follow God’s will.

And by the way, God bless you all.

I hope he remembered to take his headgear off before he started, the murdering, psychotic fuck.

Saturday, 17 January 2009

If you want to get ahead, get a hat

Fuck tinfoil, take control with the technology the powers that be do not want you to know about!
Slap one of these on your victim's head and they will be under your complete control!
You won't be a nobody anymore, even the world's most powerful people will suck your cock...








.....All day long.

With thanks to the aangirfan gestalt for the images.

Friday, 15 February 2008

The Blair Identity/Supremacy/Ultimatim/Legacy/Betrayal

It's very rare here at the Alliance that we get anything wrong. The great thing, however, is that we're manly enough to admit it.
Previously we have referred to our former prime minister (below) as :

to name a few. While these things are all still as true now, we welcome the chance to honour him for his fearless defence of the people of Great Britain.

When the threat was made clear, he acted decisively to avert catastrophe. So, next time you think ill of the psychopathic cunt, remember how many millions of lives he saved by his actions. The threat was real, unlike all the other times.

Dec 8 2006, London, England....The Serious Fraud Office were closing in on the web of corruption surrounding the export of death technologies to an Arab country. Normally this wouldn't be a problem. Arabs, as we know all too well, are prone to exploding, especially while trying to impose 'the caliphate' over the entire world.
However, our brave lads at the SFO had inadvertently picked on Saudi Arabia .
The then Prime minister generally loathed Arabs, and had long been trying to kill as many as he could. But these were different, well connected to the western power elite.

Once you got to know them, it was easy to accept their simple pursuit of 21st century absolutist feudal monarchy, their execution of witches and the rather 'traditional' approach to political parties, trade unions and women's voting rights.

Understand our leader's dilemma. Here he was, guardian of the nation's judicial system,his flock's spritual and moral leader. Yet also their sole protector. If he let the 'bureaucrats' prosecute, there would be blood on the streets of london. He knew this, because Prince Bandar had told him. The news filled him with dread. The story going round was that Saudi hijackers were behind that fateful day, september 11, 2001. This had naturally prompted us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.

His empty head began to fill with with terrible possibilities. Was terrorism somehow connected with the secretive and lavishly funded networks of the international security state? Had he killed all those men, women and children for nothing,(apart from the oil stuff)? Could he, one of the most powerful cocksuckers ever to hold office, have been so terribly wrong??

Then, as he brooded over this terrible awakening, the nightmarish reverie was broken by the ring of his commecially confidential hotline. Picking up, a voice croaked the mysterious words; "£43 billion".
The effect was instantaneous!
He was no longer the Prime Minister. The shackles of justice, accountability and democracy fell, releasing him to rise above principle and once again 'do what's right'.
The trigger words from his BAE handler had wrenched him back. Back to his glamorous secret agent past.
He reverted to the cold blooded master of deception he had been when he minced about under the codename 'Miranda'!
All the training from his carefree days of snitching on CND flooded back,filling him with a righteous, uncomplicated vigour.

Agent Miranda

In a flash he knew exactly what to do.

Speed dialling the SFO, he got hold of the investigation chief. If the case wasn't dropped, he explained, people would die and BAE would drop £43 billion, jeopardising its share price! After some humming and hawing over due process, the functionary crumbled like a junior law clerk on his first date.

'Miranda' as he would now forever be, slammed down the phone. He spun his chair and looked intently, yet fondly, into the mirror.
He liked what he saw.
He realised, through working in secret, his subjects would never find out. Those grotesque lumpen clods, who dared call themselves 'the electorate', would continue wallowing in ignorance of the sacrifices he made.
A fleeting moment of bitterness clouded his mind. Would they ever show him the gratitude he deserved?
Yet he still felt proud....How many could save thousands of white people from 'unimaginable carnage™' and 43 billion quid in one day?

There'll be a bit of that coming my way, he comforted himself, when the people finally let me go........

Friday, 18 January 2008

Joining the dots-one of an endless series

Connecting the "dots" is one of the few truly human pleasures left to the depraved personality that comprises a genuine conspiraloon.
Upon my return from my latest alien abduction, I was struck by the sheer weirdness of the information presented by the hated mainstream media. Nothing in my newly minted dental implants could explain what what was presented before me!
I therefore throw myself on the mercy and generosity that is the hallmark of the gentle conspiraloon community!
The first question that that vexed me was of the motivations of our middle east envoy to stand shoulder to shoulder with this monster?

Tony Blair is widening his post-premiership portfolio by becoming an unpaid adviser to the Rwandan government of President Kagame.
What on earth can our former prime minster can have in common with:
  • A Ugandan military leader who used terrorist activity to attack a sovereign government?
  • Who is suspected of assassinating his political rivals?
  • Trained by the american military?
  • Responsible fo the deaths of hundreds and thousands of innocent people?
  • A leader who imprisons opponents without evidence or trial?
  • Internally displaced a million people in the country he invaded?
  • Created over a million refugees from the country he 'liberated'?
  • A keen tennis player and football fan?
Beats me.............

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

Pow -El gets a proper job



Having tirelessly served the people for the last few years, rather than retreat to his ice fortress, the sinister Pow-El has opted for a little ME time:

Jonathan Powell, one of Tony Blair's closest advisers during his time as UK prime minister, is set to enter the banking world after agreeing to join one of Wall Street's biggest firms.

Morgan Stanley's NY base which, like most of these buildings, strongly resembles a big friendly owl

Don't fret, the government is still in safe, scaly hands:

The appointment will further strengthen ties between the Labour government and the US bank after Gordon Brown appointed Jeremy Heywood as head of domestic policy in June.

Mr Heywood, who quit as principal private secretary to Mr Blair in 2003, subsequently spent four years as co-head of Morgan Stanley's UK investment banking business before taking his position in Mr Brown's cabinet.

What special expertise will Pow-El bring to the house of Morgan Stanley? After all, his only real experience is in the controlled demolition of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq.


"Why don't you take off that itty-bitty shirt. Them panties too. "

What, beyond his "young, purdy mouth", can this modest destroyer of societies offer a merchant bank?
According to Morgan Stanley's recruitment supremo (above):

Mr Powell will be responsible for introducing the bank to important governmental and corporate clients he met during his time as aide to Mr Blair.

We have underground samizdat publication, The Daily Telegraph to thank for confirming what we at the Alliance have long suspected:

It has become increasingly commonplace for investment banks to hire former government ministers and politicians to introduce them to clients and brief them on government policy.....
Former Conservative prime minister John Major is a senior adviser to Credit Suisse while ex-German chancellor Gerhard Schröder works part-time for Rothschild.
Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi spent time with Goldman Sachs before and after his first spell as Italian leader in the 1990s.

Morgan Stanley declined to comment.

I hope you, brothers and sisters, do not feel the same way.

Sunday, 18 November 2007

Get a load of this fucking cunt

Counterfactual fiction is a popular genre where turning points in history are reconsidered with a different outcome than the one we accept as reality.
Usually they involve Hitler winning the WW2 and we find ourselves in a world where nazi sympathisers such as IBM, Coca Cola, the Thyssen-Bornemisza and Bush families actually profit from the war! Henceforth this is now officially old hat.
We have entered the age of counterfactual reality.....

Meet the Family
POW-EL AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA POE-EL
The Powell family have been assigned the franchise of political handlers by our overlords. Between them, they have diligently tended the dismantling of representative government we have enjoyed over the last 30 years. Curiously the two wings of this management team pronounce their surnames differently; brother Charles takes the aristocratic styling of 'POE-EL' while Jonathan favours Enoch's earthy, demotic 'POW-EL', as befits one who leans to the left. Maybe they do it lest the 'general public' realise they came from the same clutch of reptile eggs.

Accept their alien gift to our planet

This talented family have today gifted us with an entirely new subgenre in POW-EL's extraordinary piece in the Observer:
which takes the final step into counterfactual-reality.
POW - EL's article, like the man himself, is obviously from another planet...I am content to let his words speak for themselves:
We now know Saddam didn't have them. But to suggest it was all a conspiracy between Tony Blair and George W Bush to pretend he did is nonsense.

So suggesting it was all a matter of Alastair Campbell cobbling together a dossier to pretend there were weapons of mass destruction is nonsense

We should have been clear we were removing Saddam because he was a ruthless dictator suppressing his people. But the lawyers said there was no legal basis for proceeding on these grounds, and so we were not able to make this case as wholeheartedly as I would have liked.
When you remove a brutal dictator who has annihilated all opposition for 30 years, it is inevitable you will face a period of anarchy when he is gone. All the basics of an ordinary society and law and order are not there.

And most of all it means trying to ensure that the US does not revert to isolationism. If it withdraws into itself as it did after Vietnam and Somalia, I fear it will face another 9/11 and all the rest of us will suffer.

Once the Sunnis have come to terms with sharing power with the Shia, our task will be done. It is only when there is a political settlement that we will be able to leave.

In Iran, I am not in favour of a military option because I don't think it is practical.

The threat we face is from those that advocate isolationism, protectionism and nativism - and it is striking how the debate on immigration has taken off in Europe and in the US.

The enemy are the people who want to divide us into groups, to turn people against one another and take society backwards.
There you have it, brothers and sisters, NWO thinking in its orginal nut shell:
We'll attack anyone we want, whenever we can get away with it, and if it goes hard on the liberated, well that's foreigners for you.
If you can find a word of truth in the whole piece, you're a better man than I.

Friday, 19 October 2007

Conspiracy Nut Speaks Out at Sinister Gathering

Taking time out from clearing up the mess Hamas caused by being democratically elected, our former prime minister bravely trousered a large speaking fee to share his demented worldview.
In a wild tale, he spoke of dark forces ranged against western civilisation,revealing the conspiracy's bloody,beating heart to be a group known only as

'The Iranians!!!'.

The venue for this outpouring of hatred was the Al Smith Memorial Dinner, an event open to anyone who ponied up the nominal £500 fee.
Mr Smith is fondly remembered as a staunch member of the Liberty League, who patriotically schemed to overthrow Franklin Delano Roosevelt back in the thirties.
Cardinal Egan, a flamboyant dresser (who, if he wasn't celibate, would definitely not be gay), introduced the speaker , noting that Winston Churchill was the last British prime minister to kill iraqi civilians and talk at this event. The speech exhibited all the hallmarks of our middle east envoy's dark obsessions, and remained clinically detached from reality throughout.
"if you ever need a babysitter..."

A transcript has yet to be found by the Alliance Laboratories, but when we do, we'll translate it into english from the original rubbish. Meanwhile here's a few morsels:
"There is a tendency even now, even in some of our own circles, to believe that they are as they are because we have provoked them and if we left them alone they would leave us alone. I fear this is mistaken!!!"
As an accomplished performer, he knew he had to give the audience what it wanted:
"This ideology now has a state - Iran - that is prepared to back and finance terror in the pursuit of destabilising countries whose people live to wish in peace!!!"
and further warned against
"rising fascism!!!*"
Alarmingly, he displayed the confusion found normally in the senile, wandering off subject to say:
“Analogies especially with the rise of fascism can be misleading but, in pure chronology, I sometimes wonder if we’re not in the 1920s, if not the 1930s, I fear.”
His words, according to the cardinal, 'lifted hearts' amongst the audience.
Who will stand with those brave, lonely souls, whose only wish is to bring the peace of the smouldering, atomic grave to Iran's oppressed?
After this sobering speech, I know one man who will.

*he might be looking in the wong place