Posts
.
It has just come to my attention that certain websites have recently attempted to imply that any 'Conspiraloons™' who harbour doubts about the official narratives of 9/11 and 7/7 are almost certainly holocaust deniers as well
This is an outrageous lie and almost certainly libelous
Far too many decent, honourable and principled fascists have sacrificed their reputations, livelihoods and sometimes their personal liberty for me to sit back and witness the good name of Revisionist Holocaust Scholarship being sullied by association with the disgusting cult of Conspiraloonacy™
Whilst it would be impossible to deny that some individual Revisionists may, from time to time, express sceptical opinions about the Official Narrative of 7/7 these views are in no way representative of the majority of contemporary, forward-thinking Nazi sympathisers who continue to maintain a broad-based, irrational hatred of all foreigners and who appreciate that Johnny Darkie almost certainly carried out 7/7 as part of a wider plot to force Britain into the Bolshevik European Union. A union which will be nowhere near as favourable to the Sacred Anglo-Saxon Race as that fought for by our beloved Fuhrer
sincerely,
David Irving
xxx
.
9 comments:
If this was a proper revisionist web site then the contents of that post should have changed at least a dozen times after you first posted it. And then it would have been deleted. It hasn't changed yet and it hasn't been deleted. I've checked. Over and over.
Your faithfully,
Outraged Ewe, favourite wife of Jacob
Peace campaigner, and denier only of the hundreds of holocausts not done by the Nazis
I've just read over at the Blairwatch site that J7T activism is synonymous with Holocaust Denial but that all the real action takes place in private parts of the forum
Where would they be exactly and how can I get access?
I've been able to locate the sections on stalking children, cruelty to small furry animals and cannibalism but the Revisionist stuff is proving to be stubbornly elusive?
(apologies for the cross post)
My boyfriend is a twat.
You have to love the logic behind the Blairwatch admins.
Quarsan says, "He [Nick Kollerstrom] has commented on Blairwatch, using astro3 and giving his website as... any guesses, people? Yes, Bridget Dunne's site! What's to debate?"
By the same token, this commment here has been left by someone using the name Nazi Apologist who gives their web site as.... any guesses, people? Yes, Quarsan's Blairwatch web site. Blairwatch are Nazi Apologists. What's to debate?
My boyfriend is a twat.
And his bird's even worse, made for each other
We don't need to approve of everything everyone associated with an organisation has ever done, to express interest in its' activities or to wish them well. Otherwise nobody would support anything.
It's good that there is a broad spectrum represented and we shall watch what happens with great interest.
In all the work done in the subject, it does seem that the most effective way of halting those comitted to violent extremism is by using people formerly committed to such a course of action.
Ha ha ha Michael Gove ha ha ha
It's true. I am a twat.
We don't need to approve of everything everyone associated with an organisation has ever done, to express interest in its' activities or to wish them well. Otherwise nobody would support anything.
So true. Hitler was misunderstood.
What you've got there is a picture of Hitler producing the Nazi delicacy known as chicken yoghurt.
Post a Comment