Friday, 23 November 2007

The Untouchables - The Conspira™ Version

.

Time for some Classic Retro-Loonery™...

and I'm not talking about bell-bottoms



...not today anyway

  • Do you want to learn about COMMUNIST BANKERS?

Of course you do

  • Would you like to see some PYRAMIDS?

Who wouldn't

  • Do you want to hear about the origins of the FEDERAL RESERVE for the umpteenth time?

It never gets old

  • Do you crave 1960's US cop show style narration?


The New World Order stops here...


Well, it would certainly make a change


Then you need to see 'The Capitalist Conspiracy'





...made by a bloke with 'Griffin' in his name so you know it's just got to be True!!™


.

8 comments:

The Antagonist said...

Well, at least the title of the film is good.

Stef said...

I bet it had you going for minute

Stef said...

It sure would help a lot if some of the more reactionary Loons out there could find a way to distinguish between Communists™ who aren't actually Communists and Communists who are actually, er, Communist

It would also be good to see a similar system rolled out for Christians who think being nice to everyone is a reasonable manner in which to go through Life and, um, Christians™ who are hanging out for the incineration of entire nations and/ or planets

Stef said...

Our Reacto-Loon™ brethren, here in the UK and US, also need to do a little work on explaining how it is that if every revolution and workers' movement over the last 250 years has been Illuminati-controlled, how could it be that any progress in social justice was made over that time

If, as many of us believe, there are forces in this world trying to push most of us back into a state of feudalism why did those same forces let so many of us escape it in the first place?

Just a wee flaw in the story but a niggling one...

Stef said...

There is actually a plausible sounding answer to that question which argues that the Elite needed a more educated, enfranchised labour force to facilitate industrialisation and to manage empire and now, thanks to retro-engineered alien technology such as computers, they don't

but that thing about labeling anyone seeking social justice as being a tool of the Elite is still just a little bit, um, pukey

Tom said...

I think you should have to live in a commune to be a Communist. Owning a federal reserve or national bank is a big no-no. A harem is not a commune either.

Once you're a dictator, you don't have to worry about what to call yourself, most people tend to call you Sir. To your face that is.

Without wanting to stand up for someone with a voice from 1950s America, there's a certain amount of truth in what he says about "organised resistance" movements being organised by the wrong side. The Stokely Carmichael stuff was quite interesting. You could look at the latter part of Malcolm X's life in that light too.

Stef said...

Just hearing the name Stokely Carmichael alone was enough to spark my interest

And as all veteran Conspiraloons know all the best Infotainment videos are composed of a precisely measured dose of 90% Truth™ and 10% Bullshit carefully formulated to keep us on our toes and to prevent complacency

J.P. Stonehouse said...

Our Reacto-Loon™ brethren, here in the UK and US, also need to do a little work on explaining how it is that if every revolution and workers' movement over the last 250 years has been Illuminati-controlled, how could it be that any progress in social justice was made over that time

If, as many of us believe, there are forces in this world trying to push most of us back into a state of feudalism why did those same forces let so many of us escape it in the first place? Just a wee flaw in the story but a niggling one...


There can be no light without darkness, no darkness without light. The dialectic is the basic operating principle, the reconciliation of opposites the basic aim. If needs be, one creates the opposition that is required to facilitate the desired reconciliation. It's like Star Wars: two different sides of the same Force, both battling for exactly the same thing. The result isn't the victory of one over the other but balance and harmony brought about by reconciling the contradiction.

You're looking at it in terms of good/bad and justice/injustice, which are examples of the kind of absolutes that those driving the process regard as heresy:

"The true name of Satan, the Kabbalists say, is that of Yahweh reversed. For Satan is not a black god but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of atheism and idolatry" -- Albert Pike

God and Satan, and by definition good and evil, are simply two sides of the same coin, two polarities of the same Force. Thus Pike concludes that Satan is a Force created for good that nonetheless may serve evil.

The ultimate expression of this was the Cold War. Take a look at the flag of the former USSR and that of the Russian Federation. The former is not the hammer and sickle* but the sun, (eclipsed by the) moon, and 'soviet' star. This is the dialectic: the masculine and active sun (Osiris) as thesis, the feminine and passive (i.e. reflective) moon (Isis) as antithesis, and the Blazing Star of Horus as synthesis (the offspring of the two symbolising the union of the masculine and feminine elements). In the same way, the flag of the Russian Federation is the Double-headed Eagle of Kadosh (the 30th, 31st and 32nd degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry are conferred by the Council of Kadosh)and represents the same thing: the union of opposites in one body. What does this tell us about the Cold War and 'Velvet Revolution'?

Those behind the process abandoned good and evil and justice and injustice as we understand them a long time ago. Right and wrong and good and bad are just different means to achieve the desired end. Their morality is that of Nietzsche: beyond good and evil.

* So why disguise it? The symbolism is also associated with Islam but referred to as the cresent moon and star (which it is not). It's a symbol of Islam in the same sense that the Star of David is the symbol of Jewish national identity: it's not - the Menorah is. See the flags of Pakistan and Turkey for example (both secular states with a system of civil law). It wouldn't do to have a Godless commie state openly display symbols associated with a major world faith, now would it?